The Challenge
A $500K annual renewal at a financial services firm was 90 days out when the company hired a new CIO. The new CIO came from a company that used our competitor and immediately questioned why they were paying for our solution. She requested a formal justification for renewal, signaling she was considering a switch.
The Approach
I requested a meeting with the new CIO within her first two weeks. Instead of presenting a product overview, I presented a business impact report: the quantified value our solution had delivered over the past year. This included a 73% reduction in password-related help desk tickets (saving $140K annually), zero credential-based security incidents (compared to four the year before deployment), and a 99.97% authentication uptime SLA.
I also asked the CIO about her strategic priorities for the first year. She wanted to modernize the identity stack and implement zero trust. I showed her our product roadmap and how our upcoming features aligned with her zero trust vision, positioning the renewal not as maintaining the status quo but as the foundation for her modernization agenda.
The Result
The CIO approved the renewal and expanded the contract by $150K to include our zero trust access control module. She later told me that the business impact report was exactly what she needed to justify the spend to her CFO and that most vendors she had worked with could not articulate their own value that clearly.
Key Takeaway
Executive changes are the most dangerous moment for any renewal. The window between a new executive joining and forming their technology opinions is narrow. Getting in front of them early with quantified business impact — not product features — sets the narrative before a competitor can.
Get new posts in your inbox
No noise. Tactical field notes when something worth sharing comes up.